Follow the
Source.

• Fictional architectural study with an illustrative San Francisco setting; no surveyed parcel or permit approval.
• San Francisco is the visual setting. The code-study sheets retain their stated rule sources and are not a San Francisco permit assessment.
• The responsible design professionals must review and correct the output before project use.
• Physical circulation checks measure the recorded source geometry. They do not establish accessibility, egress, structural or fire compliance.
• The held input does not include a lateral structural design or a verified site fire-access arrangement. The corresponding sheets identify those missing inputs.
• Facade materials, canopy dimensions and opening sizes are authored design assumptions. Product selection and engineering remain subject to review.
• The roof garden is a fictional resident amenity. Its deck, guards, shade frame, planters and reserved walkway are modeled design assumptions. Occupant capacity, accessible roof access, independent exits, structural loads, drainage and guard design are unverified.
• The canopy comparison uses two recorded runs. The changed width does not establish structural capacity.
• Rendered lighting and surroundings are presentation choices. Building dimensions and modeled openings come from the downloadable element record.

The PDF checks report 12 passing categories and 1 with findings. Read the findings before using this set.